Platform

Intelligence recommendations

Overlap and coverage numbers are evidence. The decision still has to be made. Intel Fusion's recommendation engine converts portfolio analytics into a prioritized, defensible action list — what to drop, what to renew, and what to bring in to close a measurable gap.

  • Evidence

    A recommendation is an argument

    Every Intel Fusion recommendation includes the evidence behind it: the underlying overlap percentages, the ATT&CK techniques affected, the annual cost, and the impact on portfolio coverage if the change is applied. A recommendation to drop a feed shows what coverage is lost (often zero — the feed was fully subsumed) and what spend is recovered. A recommendation to pilot a new feed shows the techniques it uniquely covers and the percentage-point lift to weighted coverage.

    This matters because rationalization rarely fails on the math. It fails when an analyst, a procurement lead, and a CISO have to agree, and no one can show their work. Intel Fusion is opinionated about making the work visible.

  • The five classes

    Recommendation classes

    The engine produces five recommendation classes, each with its own rationale template:

    • Consolidate. Two or more sources are mutually redundant. The recommendation cites the asymmetric overlap analysis and identifies which feed to retain.
    • Drop. A feed contributes nothing unique against the rest of the portfolio. The cost is freed for reinvestment.
    • Renew. A feed contributes uniquely on techniques no other source covers; the renewal is defensible.
    • Pilot. A candidate from the catalog closes a measured gap. The recommendation includes expected coverage lift and the techniques addressed.
    • Replace. A cheaper or higher-fidelity alternative covers more of what a current paid feed covers, with quantified coverage lift.
  • Ranking

    Prioritization

    Recommendations are ranked by expected operational impact, not just dollar savings. A consolidation that saves $40K but reduces weighted ATT&CK coverage by two percentage points may rank below a $15K pilot that lifts coverage by eight. Cost, coverage delta, and portfolio risk are all surfaced so security leadership can apply their own weighting if they disagree with the default.

  • The human in the loop

    Analyst review, not automation

    Recommendations are designed to be reviewed by a human analyst before any action is taken. The engine surfaces the case; the analyst applies organizational context the engine does not have — contract timing, vendor relationships, classified intelligence requirements, sharing agreements. The AI-assisted analyst workflows provide a working surface for that review.

Related

Get a ranked, defensible action list for your CTI portfolio.

Request a demo to see Intel Fusion's recommendation engine working over a real-world portfolio.